tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.comments2023-06-08T01:26:04.133-07:00A Fiercer Delight and a Fiercer Discontentstanfordhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comBlogger473125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-66782253825390457152022-10-29T01:19:49.051-07:002022-10-29T01:19:49.051-07:00Thank you forr sharing thisThank you forr sharing thisPressure Washing Akronhttps://www.pressure-washing-service.com/us/power-washing-ohio/pressure-washing-akron.shtmlnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-42869716890178831032022-06-13T10:06:13.900-07:002022-06-13T10:06:13.900-07:00Great rreading thisGreat rreading thisKaleb Stonehttps://www.kalebstone.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-30402837669273587832021-12-28T05:29:32.104-08:002021-12-28T05:29:32.104-08:00Great post, I'm glad I found it! Very informat...Great post, I'm glad I found it! Very informativeSarahttps://www.civilgeo.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-57137927654486451982019-03-26T19:54:19.407-07:002019-03-26T19:54:19.407-07:00this post deserves a comment.this post deserves a comment.nic gibsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620928973251572387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-28844579724431748402018-09-10T07:16:25.795-07:002018-09-10T07:16:25.795-07:00This is a fun and interesting post. I even used a ...This is a fun and interesting post. I even used a few examples in one of my classes. Thanks!Monte Knetterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01269223375446803723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-88062265483995467722018-05-31T22:05:34.186-07:002018-05-31T22:05:34.186-07:00Finally got a chance to read this, good stuff. I h...Finally got a chance to read this, good stuff. I had completely forgotten about ngrams. One of my favorites were "soda, pop, evil" (1990 on). "Bower, Gibson" is about right as well. I firmly applaud wild speculation about data trends. Also, Civil Wars! Justin Bowerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11918590992060850747noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-69383540966450991902017-10-17T23:15:45.463-07:002017-10-17T23:15:45.463-07:00My Friend Tiffany is an English Professor at a gre...My Friend Tiffany is an English Professor at a great school...and here thoughts were elaborate enough that I gave them their own post: <br /><br />http://stanford-gibson.blogspot.com/2014/10/tiffanys-top-ten-study-advice-part-2.htmlstanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-16635859786792221602017-10-17T23:14:09.225-07:002017-10-17T23:14:09.225-07:00Finally, my friend George is a Math Education prof...Finally, my friend George is a Math Education professor at my undergrad (and who as a student helped me master Calculus in an act of 'achademic generosity'). He weighed in on the discussion:<br /><br />I wholeheartedly agree with the advice given thus far.The idea of budgeting your time is a big one for me. Every person gets 168 hours a week; none of us is rich or poor in this area. If you don't block out hours to study for my calculus class, your suite mates will fill your time with senseless pursuits. If you don't block out time for personal renewal / devotions / DQT, a myriad of events that comprise the Tyranny of the Urgent will suck that time.<br /><br />Also, go see your professors during office hours. It's not like detention on high school; it's more like one-on-one help for free that the professor is required to give.<br /><br />And I love the talk about flow. Teaching people to think about building positive momentum in a particular direction is important. Creativity is messy, and people would think that it can be summed up in some easy algorithm.<br /><br />The big thing for college students to see is that they have great freedom... And with great freedom comes great responsibility. :)stanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-63424683679276669732017-10-17T23:13:49.994-07:002017-10-17T23:13:49.994-07:00And one more from Teresa:
"One more I would...And one more from Teresa: <br /><br />"One more I would add would be: take the time you need to think. You covered this. But I would reiterate that for the humanities that this is urgent and necessary in order to make the most of this discipline. I have to cut out the time I need to sit and think. I don't read or make notes, I sit and process. Sometimes this means yoga, sometimes meditations, sometimes a quiet place in a museum or library. It doesn't LOOK like working, so finding a place to be that won't get interrupted or distracted is important."stanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-10759278307542307412017-10-17T23:13:33.439-07:002017-10-17T23:13:33.439-07:00And Thoughts from My Friend Teresa, who got her Ph...And Thoughts from My Friend Teresa, who got her PhD from Oregon a few years ago and has been a Tenure track English professor since:<br /><br />As to: "A good study group can be hit or miss in the humanities"<br /><br />I have been doing more reading on what works as a study group in the humanities, and it looks like students who are first-generation or traditionally at-risk students do better in study groups, even if they aren't very focused.<br /><br />In "Whistling Vivaldi" the author (I can't remember his name) discusses the concept of identity threat, which more or less prevents the students who need the most help from asking for help.<br /><br />Those who were brought up in a fierce independence because of identity or stereotype threat tend to be students who fail, because they didn't have people to talk to who they trusted enough to ask for help.<br /><br />This concept struck home with me, as this was part of my college experience. I got lucky, so I didn't fail, but I certainly didn't do as well as I should have as an undergraduate. stanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-57833912356519532902017-10-17T23:13:15.264-07:002017-10-17T23:13:15.264-07:00My Friend Rich is a Math and Physics Professor at ...My Friend Rich is a Math and Physics Professor at a major University. He sent me 10 reflections of his own:<br /><br />1. Go to class. Studies show that there is a direct correlation between class attendance and GPA. <br /><br />2. Be an active learner. One example came from a discussion that I had today. Many of my classes now have an online component. Specifically, I introduce class topics with a 15-minute pre-lecture. However, students need to learn how to take advantage of online lectures. They can't simply passively listen to the online lecture. They should be taking notes and trying to understand as they would in the classroom.<br /><br />3. You aren't going to love every class, but understand there may be a reason why you are taking that class. In a panel discussion last night, some of our former students said that they didn't understand why they had to take a computer science class graduating with a math major. Now, they wish that they had had more CS classes.<br /><br />(Stanford Note: Tiffany also stressed this, and more specifically I should have minored in computer science)<br /><br />4. Make the most of every situation. I took a class on the -ology of education (physiology, sociology, etc.). I had to write a research paper for the class. <br /><br />I chose to write about the Jesuit views of education because it was a topic that I wanted to learn more about. Somehow, this was one of only two research papers that I wrote in college. (I am not counting papers like those in our Humanities classes about the books that we read.)<br /><br />5. Many of my best students do well because they start early on assignments. Don't wait until the last minute.<br /><br />6. Don't wait until the last minute to ask questions. You might not get your question answered before the exam or you might forget your question altogether.<br /><br />7. Don't be afraid to take writing, speaking, and critical thinking classes. The best class I ever took in college was a College Writing class at St. John Fisher College before transferring to Geneseo. My writing improved 100-fold, which I still use to this day.<br /><br />Stanford Note: Another place where Tiffany, Rich and I agree.<br /><br />8. Don't be afraid to pave your own path. High-end students will often take the path less traveled by finding a way to develop their own curriculum or take courses of interest that aren't required of them.<br /><br />9. Along with that, high-end students often engage in learning outside of the classroom environment. If you are interested in teaching, volunteer in a classroom as early as possible during a semester to gain valuable experience and see if that path is really right for you. Or find summer internships in your field. Or engage yourself in research project supervised by a college professor. I wouldn't be in my current position without having engaged in undergraduate research.<br /><br />10. It makes sense that you talk a great deal about flow since you study groundwater flow.<br /><br />Stanford Note: :)stanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-72293056007035179262017-02-15T14:51:30.328-08:002017-02-15T14:51:30.328-08:00Lots of good thoughts here, for a blog post I read...Lots of good thoughts here, for a blog post I read months too late, but which has remained surprisingly relevant. One comment, with regard to the following quote:<br /><br />"I can’t apologize for not blogging. And, frankly, no one is asking me to."<br /><br />I want to go on the record as asking you to blog more.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18046229824661125115noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-17915392433193788212016-12-26T20:57:11.872-08:002016-12-26T20:57:11.872-08:00This kind of thinking fascinates and frustrates me...This kind of thinking fascinates and frustrates me to no end. There is understanding and access to a whole new world view in it, and I can't get there from here. It's another language. I'm one of those people who took some satisfaction in saying that I've never once needed algebra since graduation (actually I once used pi to make brownies, because all I had were round cake pans and the recipe called for square). The only numerical pursuit I had in college was taking statistics in grad school, which accounts for what I think is a vague understanding of what is going on here. I just don't speak math, and I am reminded here, once again, that I am the poorer for it.Aeiou1962https://www.blogger.com/profile/16269211871973765877noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-20105353632014555252016-12-19T06:48:49.689-08:002016-12-19T06:48:49.689-08:00I gave a talk on this topic if you are interested....I gave a talk on this topic if you are interested. Scroll down to the Psalms section at this link: http://stanfordmp3.blogspot.com/stanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-32148233790835150982016-11-08T15:00:44.344-08:002016-11-08T15:00:44.344-08:00Hi Monte,
Both of your comments are fair.
I am...Hi Monte,<br /><br />Both of your comments are fair. <br /><br />I am not a modernist and I don't believe modernism has a priori epistemic preference over post modernism. I think they both have epistemological strengths and deep debilitating epistemological errors. I'd like to think of myself as an ancient-modern (but that's optimistic), and find that the Biblical tension between explicit revelation and self-skepticism keep both modernism's triumphalism and post-modernism's solipsism at bay. Regarding footnote 12, I'd like to think your more generous read is correct. I have firm conviction but want to err on the side of generosity in my discourse.<br /><br />Regarding Secretary Clinton and drones. Your argument is cogent and one I have considered. It might be right. The main difference for me is that Secretary Clinton would follow the President Obama-Bush legacy of calculated drone strikes, which are deeply disturbing but come out of a moral calculus with boundary conditions I do not have access to. What I fear from Mr Trump is capricious drone activity.<br /><br />It wasn't fair to call it an easy election. I can't remember ever feeling this dissatisfied with the candidate I selected. But I knew who I couldn't vote for. <br /><br />I'm so relived it is almost over. I've found that my vote exacts a psychological toll completely out of proportion to its influence. And that is before we even get to the 17 California props, which I easily sunk 10 hours I didn't have into, and still was puzzled by 3 of them.<br /><br />I think you are right. These are the candidates we deserve. I share your prayer, that whoever wins would exceed all our expectations of wisdom, temperance, and decency.stanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-76872436868453941372016-11-08T07:09:37.592-08:002016-11-08T07:09:37.592-08:00Regarding policy, I believe Ms. Clinton would do f...Regarding policy, I believe Ms. Clinton would do far more damage with drones. Right now the United States is currently bombing or subsidizing the bombing of Somalia, Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen, and Syria. There is no indication from Ms. Clinton that she will be less aggressive than President Obama (indeed, she helped to form our current foreign policy!). On the contrary, she seems likely to take a more hawkish stance. <br /><br />Trump on the hand is a populist and as such is likely to revert to isolationism. To my knowledge, no American populist has started or intensified a foreign war. On the contrary, “America first” populists tend to ignore foreign affairs. The bigger concern, as you hinted at, is mistreatment of minority status citizens. (For example, Jackson didn’t start a foreign war, but his Native American policies were some of the worst in our nation’s history.) <br /><br />In talking to some friends that live in the Middle East I was surprised to hear that Trump is far and away the preferred candidate. As bad as Bush’s policies were, deaths in the Middle East have risen under Obama. Middle Eastern men and women fear that Ms. Clinton will continue these policies. They don’t know what Trump will do, but think the current course is so bad that anything else would be an improvement. <br /><br />All in all, this isn’t an easy election. Neither candidate is fit for office on any level. Yet both are probably the types of candidates that we deserve. My prayer is that God will be more gracious to us than we deserve.Monte Knetterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01269223375446803723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-2427553286614699472016-11-08T07:09:04.649-08:002016-11-08T07:09:04.649-08:00Interesting thoughts. I’ve read some of your posts...Interesting thoughts. I’ve read some of your posts before and listened to some of your talks with profit and I find you to be thoughtful and honest thinker.<br /><br />I’d disagree with one aspect of your approach and one of you policy preferences. First, the approach.<br /><br />I have the sense that there is too much of the post-modern ethos in your approach. I know post-modernism can be vague so let me briefly define what I mean. By post-modernism I mean the belief that a subject cannot be separated from an object—i.e. that we as humans project our identity, whether it be our ethnicity, class, sex, nationality, etc. unto all objects and that therefore no object can be objectively known. For example, we all experience words differently and we have to thereby deconstruct all language and can never have true human communication. First, I think this is fundamentally false in that we have real (though admittedly imperfect) communication. Second, as a Christian the implications of this are horrible. If I as a subject project myself into all objects, can I ever read or understand the Bible with any confidence? I don’t believe I can and all I am left with is personal, mystical experiences. These experiences generally lead people away from Biblical and historical Christianity to an inner mysticism wherein the ego and libido get divine sanction. <br /><br />The place where I believe the influence of post-modernism is clearest is in footnote 12 where you wrote: “but [abortion] is an incredible difficult position as well, with many implications about gender power and class and race and economic inequality.” Perhaps you are just being very generous and I am reading too much into this, but I think the lack of confidence in a very clear issue is a sign of a misplaced philosophical commitment. <br /><br />This is not to say that people don’t need to be aware of their historical circumstances when they think through things to be sure they don’t have biases, but I believe people can know some things confidently. But you and I both would be hard pressed to think of any moral, political, social, or historical issue that does not involve issues of gender, class, ethnicity, etc.! Even so, many issues are clear. American slavery, the 2nd Punic War, Japanese internment, the holocaust, the Persian Wars, enclosure—these all involve a myriad of issues yet all can be morally solved with relative ease. By using reason and consulting tradition the abortion question is fairly easily solved. But we need to admit that a subject can be relatively independent of an object to come to this conclusion and to do that we need to keep the prevailing ethos of post-modernism at arm’s length. <br />Monte Knetterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01269223375446803723noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-39020745467655222782016-10-19T00:13:12.444-07:002016-10-19T00:13:12.444-07:00Hi Nic,
I reject over half your premises, which ...Hi Nic, <br /><br />I reject over half your premises, which surprises neither of us. But I prefer these conversations IRL.<br /><br />And a 1440 word comment surprises none of the onlookers who saw your brother string 2500 words of footnotes on a 990 word post.<br /><br />So lets focus on your final point on which we largely agree. The free press is stuck in the epistemological morass of peer effects and is not performing its necessary functions. I agree that it is a very big deal. I remember dad telling me that the free press can be annoying but it is essential. This is not the press he was talking about. The state of discourse is worse than the state of politics, and John Oliver is as guilty as the Fox news crew. Oliver et al are an ideological hegemony who didn't treat 15 of the 16 republican candidates fairly (ok, maybe 8). I'd love to stand up to them. But they did not form my assessment of the Republican Candidate...he did.<br /><br />Looking forward to seeing you and the family in a couple weeks.stanfordhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07591716618038804118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-35126626245892952162016-10-18T11:52:53.489-07:002016-10-18T11:52:53.489-07:00last, I think it is fairly important for the Ameri...last, I think it is fairly important for the American public not to hand the American press corps a win in the situation. If they refuse to honestly report on Sec. Clinton's many illegal indiscretions and obstructions of justice, how can we believe that they will be watchdogs over her administration? We cannot. However, we know that they will be there to criticize every sideways breath of Mr. Trump should he be president. In short, the only way we can believe in a free press in our current America, is if the president is of a different party than 95% of the press. Is the only way to force the fourth branch of government to work, and that is a very big deal. example: Trump makes crude remarks and emails reveal that Sec. Clinton broke even more laws. The press covers it at a ratio of 24:1 against Trump. <br /><br />so I respectfully disagree that this is an easy choice for Clinton. I think this is the most difficult election in our lifetime, and certainly the worst choice of major party candidates. Although Trump is my 16th choice out of 16 Republican candidates, and my 21st choice out of 25 candidates for president, I will vote for him on election day.<br /><br />so I guess mom has the deciding vote for our family.<br />nic gibsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620928973251572387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-85917070612133412802016-10-18T11:52:36.103-07:002016-10-18T11:52:36.103-07:00Further, judicial appointments and other appointme...Further, judicial appointments and other appointments matter greatly in the rule of law and functionality of our country. With most of American laws now being made as bureaucratic memos and executive directives within executive departments, the appointees of these apartments and executive philosophy guiding them is critical. Pres. Obama has not only had the opportunity to appoint Supreme Court justices, he has been packing federal courts for eight years, producing many of the legal decisions the Supreme Court has chosen not to overturn. Judicial appointments on the Supreme Court level, and at the appellate court level are extremely influential in the present system of government that we have. Further, and more importantly, the courts may be the only recourse American citizens have against the increasingly large bureaucratic forces of the executive departments- like the EPA, the Department of Justice, and others. Therefore, for the maintenance of individual rights and freedoms, it is incredibly imperative in the bureaucratic state that the courts are not in the hands of people that are pro-bureaucratic, collectivistic and progressive. People utilizing judicial philosophies in which things don't mean what they say can overrule virtually all of the rights lay down regarding personal freedom. One organization has already estimated the attacks on religious liberty in America to be up 133% in the last three years. Clinton may be able to appoint 4 or more judges in a four-year term, which would have an incredibly negative effect on the court in relationship to anything related to the right of any civil unit besides the federal government including self-government, family government, church government, civil society and state government. It is often not taught in civics lessons how large a part federalism in local control was designed into our system of government so that states like California couldn't dictate the way of life of people in Nebraska or Connecticut or Ohio. With an ever-increasing executive bureaucracy, a decreasing place of Congress in the making of practical law, and a court increasingly complicit with that bureaucracy, the subsidiary rights are breaking down quickly. <br />Trump knows that Christians and conservatives are very concerned about judicial appointments, and he may even have the tenacity to point actually conservative people, something earlier Republican presidents failed to do consistently. It is very likely he will stick to the justices names that he has already released, most of them being very good choices. <br />nic gibsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620928973251572387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-76835952830479729542016-10-18T11:52:23.996-07:002016-10-18T11:52:23.996-07:00I also don't think the "trusting trump wi...I also don't think the "trusting trump with drones" argument is very persuasive. There is good evidence in trump's long business career that he is quite adept at balancing costs and benefits, and considering repercussions for the actions that he takes. There is also good evidence that he tends to surround himself with competent people – his present campaign staff perhaps notwithstanding (I attribute that to him not knowing the job he was hiring those people for very well). Presidents make these decisions in the presence of key advisors, and Trump is utilizing normal Republican advisers in areas where he lacks expertise – utilizing scholars from the heritage foundation, American enterprise Institute, Cato and even Brookings and others. You can see this and how he has softened his language on trade policy. I think the argument that he's going to have an itchy trigger finger is conjecture that lacks real support. it seems like putting a lot of weight on an issue we in the public cannot know very much about. And remember, these kinds of arguments were also falsely used to attack Goldwater as well. This whole, "you can't trust that Republican with the trigger" trope is well-worn. what is different about Trump, is his criticism of our Middle Eastern wars. If there is a danger with him, it is isolationism not international interventionism. My fear is that like Bill Clinton, we will stay out of wars but allowed two very preventable genocides.<br />nic gibsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620928973251572387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-58469421272629433752016-10-18T11:52:08.346-07:002016-10-18T11:52:08.346-07:00However, it should also be noted that the but offi...However, it should also be noted that the but official effects of sentencing laws are often not discussed when people laments disparities in incarceration rates. I've heard several scholars clarify that a small proportion of people commit the vast majority of violent crimes in our society. Most of those crimes are committed in minority neighborhoods against minorities- namely, African-Americans and Latinos. A large percentage, if not the majority, of violent crimes are committed by people who have previous records, many of whom are on parole. I don't think we should treat the conundrums of criminal justice as simple questions of racial disparity. Ultimately, I believe they can only be handled morally without reference to pragmatics, or disparity. One can only asked the question, "what is the right punishment for committing X". And this must be done without reference to what we may gain by imprisoning the person longer, or by considering how many of their race are already incarcerated. Punishments can morally only be deserved. Increased incarceration rates has as much to do with urban decay, horrific public schools, policies that have destroyed the black family, ghettoization projects, and other tampering's with the black family as with sentencing laws passed with the overwhelming support of the Congressional Black Caucus. <br />nic gibsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620928973251572387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-35004356240239795012016-10-18T11:51:54.632-07:002016-10-18T11:51:54.632-07:00Also, it is very difficult to argue that sentencin...Also, it is very difficult to argue that sentencing disparity is the #1 injustice in this country, even racially speaking. Government caused economic underperformance effects literally everyone every moment of every day. remember that overall American black wealth has been cut about in half in the last eight years, and economic malaise disproportionately affects minorities. The American government school system has been called by some and "educational Holocaust", even Obama's education secretary Arnie Duncan was very strongly in favor of charter and choice schools – something Clinton has not been supportive of. In the Obama administration, the black lobby had more power than the teachers lobby in some situations. I don't see good evidence that that will continue because of the large financial contributions the unions make two Democratic politics. I also don't think Christians should forget that abortion is the greatest human rights crisis and injustice in America, and that presently half of the black babies in New York City are aborted every year. Just because we don't have much hope in changing it, we shouldn't forget that it is unavoidably the greatest injustice in our country, and possibly the world – making our leadership in global abortion a large part of our true global moral shame.<br />nic gibsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620928973251572387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-17284900401521620882016-10-18T11:51:43.528-07:002016-10-18T11:51:43.528-07:00I'm not sure the disqualifying nature of high ...I'm not sure the disqualifying nature of high crimes and misdemeanors otherwise committed in offices and misuses of power are sufficiently taken into account when comparing Trump and Clinton as morally qualified for office in terms of dignity. I suppose it is a judgment call in how much one would weigh these against each other, but Clinton's crimes against the rules of our system, obstruction of the justice process, misuse of classified information, and so on are all immediately related to the office itself and the parameters of it's functional integrity. These seem to me to be more basic consideration than trump's mouth or unsubstantiated accusations of sexual indiscretions. although I believe Trump should be considered disqualified as a figure for the office, I believe it is even more certain that Sec. Clinton has completely disqualified herself from holding the functions of the office. That disqualification is the only one that can be even more foundational then trumps disqualification as a figure for the office.<br />nic gibsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13620928973251572387noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2395090220691101609.post-74279884563205590802016-10-17T06:22:19.211-07:002016-10-17T06:22:19.211-07:00Well said!Well said!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15156254239814502841noreply@blogger.com