I recently gave two talks on work.
The first argued that our culture underrates
vocation, the second argued that canonical clichés put too much hope in our
careers and dreams.
So what’s true? Is
work too important or not important enough?
Well, yes.[1]
Some days we vest our work with too much meaning, giving it
power over us. Other days we despair at the basic meaninglessness or
bureaucratic frustrations that surround it.
Life happens in
the tension of aspiration and contentment.
Overrating aspiration[2]
creates disappointment and bitterness.
Overrating contentment creates regret and…well…bitterness.[3]
Thesis: Aspiration and
contentment aren’t competitive entities. They aren’t zero-sum enemies. They are both
necessary components of spiritual and psychological sustainability in our world
and economy.
Here’s how I think it works in Love and Vocation (spoiler
alert, they are parallel):
Love
Love starts easy, requiring neither the hard work of
aspiration nor the hard work of contentment.
The magnitude of the lover’s passion and the loveliness of
the loved fills the gap between them.
Passion of the lover meets the perceived worthiness of the loved. In other words, between the lover and the
loved (and visa versa) there is enough passion and attraction to fill the gap
between them and everything is awesome:
But, of course, it’s also an unsustainable lie. None of us are as lovely as we appear at
first. We do not withstand scrutiny
well. And as everyone knows, after about
18 months, a crack begins to form between the sufficiency of passion and
attraction, as both begin to wane a bit.
Then the full disclosure of marriage sets in, and the lovers find that
the sum of passion and attraction are not sufficient to carry the day.
Both sides require discipline. In a real live partnership, a 100%/100%
shared covenant, both respond with action.
The loved responds with aspiration,
trying to become easier to love and the lover responds with contentment, learning to love
the actual person they chose, not some romanticize projection of themselves
they imagined in the sexually surcharged early days of their relationship.
Those who stick to it, find real, live, sustainable,
no-kidding, LOVE, as aspiration,
turns into growth, new things to generate attraction and contentment
manifests as grace, enoughness, extending love without condition. And the sum of these, fill the gap.
And of course, an exactly symmetrical process mirrors this
in healthy relationships.
Vocation
I had a professor once who said “Freud was wrong about
almost everything, but he was wrong in really interesting ways.” I think one of the things he was actually
right about was the centrality of love and work to our overall well being.
And the longer I do both, the more I find the
skills required to thrive in them complementary.
When we start to explore a particular niche in the economy
and world of mutual service, our future work seemed exciting. It seemed to bubble with potential, and it is
easy to generate passion about how work can affect our world. Uncluttered by the boring details or soul
deadening bureaucracies, it seemed that some combination of our passion and our
job’s interestingness should carry the day.
But you don’t have to work very long to get disillusioned
with this. Soon a gap of dissatisfaction
opens between your passion for the work and the work’s worthiness.
This requires the same, two-front strategy as love.
But Contentment fills the gap, active disciplines of enoughness fills the gap between you and your job with joy and gratitude and the privilege to work, to bring order out of chaos, to participate in the image of God as a co-maker, as a collaborating artist.
This post was written while listening to the Beautiful Eulogy[4]
Pandora Station.
[1]
This is the biggest challenge of preaching. (Or blogging, which I’ve decided is
essentially the new preaching…except for TED talks, which are actually preaching without trying to pretend they are something else.) Most theology and
reality is in tension, and our traumas come from over-emphasizing one side of
the tension or the other. But in any
given room, or sub culture, or ‘readership,’ there are some who need to move
one way and some who have to move the other.
And for most of us, we inflict both traumas on ourselves at various
times. So you can almost never say, “the
problem is.” It is usually “the problem
is cross pressured by these two contrasting distortions."
[2]
This was the basic motivation of my second talk. Overrating aspiration is one of the reasons
young adults find the 20s so depressing.
[3]
There are two kinds of bitter old people, those who gave it everything, and
came up short, and those who wish they’d tried harder.
[4]
More on this later…but while I was busy dismissing it as an indistinc prong of the CCM industry for the last decade or
so, Christian rap got shockingly good.
Christian rap isn’t just a sub-genre of Christian music…it’s something
totally different.
1 comment:
"except for blogging, which I'm convinced is the new preaching..."
ha. I think about this often: is blogging the same as preaching? And if it is (or if there is a substantial overlap), why is the conservative church not rebuking me for writing? I"m guessing it has something to do with the assumption of authority: someone standing in a pulpit is not saying "accept these words if you like" (as a blogger is), but is saying "this is what God's word means... and you MUST heed it." Unless one is a particularly pushy blogger, I suppose that's the difference.
Not that this relates to the content of the rest of your post... but I always like the footnotes so thought I'd comment on that for a change.
Post a Comment